Which is better: VAZ-2112 or VAZ-2114, reviews

In fact, we are still in a better position than some Mr. Hope from Arizona. This is someone you really won’t envy if you set out to buy an inexpensive domestic car. There are so many Dodges alone that you could spend a week reviewing the technical specifications. Everything is much simpler here. Several factories answer all our rich requests, but the consumer most often trusts time-tested Samara. But even here there is a choice. For fun, you can compare two cars - VAZ 2112 and VAZ 2114.

general characteristics

So, let's start with the “twelve”. This machine is a derivative of the “ten”, the development of which began during the USSR. The first hatchback was released in 1999. The car was mass-produced until 2008 and underwent minor technical changes (in particular, these are the engines, which we will talk about later). On the basis of this car, the Priora was then created.

As for the “fourteenth”, it is the direct successor of the “nine”. The car was mass-produced from 1997 to 2013. The assembly took place in Tolyatti and Zaporozhye. As he himself says, it is an improved version of the first generation “Samara”. First of all, the changes affected driving performance, braking system and appearance.

Design

“Dvenashka” is a five-door hatchback. Externally, it is no different from the “ten”, which was produced since 1995. The car has rectangular headlights very similar to the Opel Caliber, as well as a flat hood that extends beyond the line of the wings. By the way, the Ladas of the tenth family were the only ones at AvtoVAZ that had such a difference in body clearances. This is also noted by reviews from owners. What is better to choose - VAZ-2112 or VAZ-2114? In terms of body clearances, the “fourteenth” is made an order of magnitude better – motorists say. As for Samara-2, it was created on the basis of the VAZ-2109.

The car has similar body contours. But the front and side parts were slightly modified. So, the car received new, more rounded headlights and a narrow radiator grille. The bumper is now painted in body color. Wide moldings and a small aerodynamic threshold also appeared on the car. There is a compact spoiler at the rear. Otherwise, the model remains virtually unchanged. Despite the update, many criticized the 14th for its bumpers. They scratched easily and were less durable than those on a “chisel”.

Susceptibility to corrosion

Low quality metal and poor operating conditions cause rapid corrosion of the body on both models. Because The cars are produced at the same plant, there is no need to talk about differences in the quality of the metal. If we consider structurally problematic areas, then on the 2114 these are the arches and the lower edge of the trunk. The power elements on the “four” last a long time. The bottom of the doors and the bottom of the car take longer to rot.

For 2112, the main problem in terms of corrosion is the rear glasses. Due to the accumulation of dirt under these power elements, they rot very quickly. Otherwise, the disadvantages are the same - arches, sills, bottom of doors.

Dimensions, ground clearance

In terms of size, these machines are almost identical. Thus, the length of the VAZ-2114 is 4.12 meters, width – 1.65 meters, height – 1.4 meters. Ground clearance is 16.5 centimeters. "Dvenashka" is a little larger. Its body length is 4.17 meters, width – 1.68 meters, height – 1.42 meters. But these parameters are so small that they are not noticed in everyday use. The same goes for ground clearance. On standard 14-inch wheels, this car has 17 cm of ground clearance. Both hatchbacks belong to the B-class and are very compact.

Exterior and interior

The VAZ 2110 is a full-fledged sedan, equipped with four doors, inflated aerodynamic body kits, large head optics and a large glazing area.

VAZ 2114 – car; in a hatchback body, repeating the style and concept of the ninth AvtoVAZ model, which is characterized by broken lines and sharp shapes. The “fourteenth” model has five doors, one of which provides access to the luggage compartment.

The interiors of the two vehicles are no different in terms of comfort: two rows of seats upholstered in fabric, a dashboard oriented toward the driver with many buttons, and small legroom.

Salon

The “two” uses the same archaic interior that was installed on the “tens” since 1995. By the way, the steering wheel and instrument panel on the 12th and 14th models were very similar. Also on the “two-wheeler” the center console is slightly rotated. There is a stove control unit, a pair of deflectors, a clock and a door opening indicator. Which is better - VAZ-2112 or VAZ-2114?

Reviews say that the interior of the “two-wheeler” is very cramped, especially in the back. The car uses hard plastic and has no steering wheel adjustments. Most models do not have any amenities - air conditioning and power windows. The trunk of the hatchback is designed for 400 liters of luggage. The back row of the rear row folds in a ratio of two to one, which allows you to transport larger items (useful volume increases to 730 liters). Although most buyers (and these are young guys) do not need this - the main thing is that a powerful subwoofer and a spare tire fit in the trunk. The “twelve” copes with this task “excellently”. By the way, the spare tire itself is hidden under the floor. There is also a compartment for tools, which is very convenient.

Now let's move on to the second generation Samara. It differs from the “nines” primarily in the new European-style panel. As you know, “nines” and “eights” were famous for their creaking and rattling panels even on smooth roads. With the release of the “fourteenth” this problem was eliminated. Although the plastic itself is also hard and requires improvements. As noted in the reviews, a 3-millimeter vibration insulation sheet solves the problem with poor noise. But it is far from being of the best quality (if we talk about the factory).

The interior of the 14th looks more successful and modern. As for the trunk, its volume is 330 liters. There is also a function for transforming the rear seat backs. What is better to take - VAZ-2112 or 2114? The interior of the latter is also very cramped. But it is more comfortable than that of the “twelve”.

VAZ 2112

At one time, our exhibits also went through this procedure. VAZ 2114 crashed in the literal sense of the word, failed the tests. Moreover, even the car’s older brother, the VAZ 2109, demonstrated the best performance. Even manufacturers still cannot understand this argument. How is it: the body, frame are almost identical, and the metal is the same, but the results are disastrous. The doomed car was pushed into an obstacle at a speed of 64 km/h. Further, it became clear: the car cannot be restored, and the mannequin was “hospitalized” with a severe traumatic brain injury. Alas, these are the realities...

As for safety, the VAZ 2112 looks preferable to its competitor. Under the same artificially created emergency conditions, the car suffered less damage, and the dummy completely survived. On the Internet you can easily find a video of the process itself and see it with your own eyes.

Comfort level

The body of the VAZ 2114 is an order of magnitude older than that of the 12th model. Despite this, the driver's workplace looks more original. A functional instrument panel, the absence of various creaks and crackles when switching levers and toggle switches - all these are the advantages of the “fourteenth” model and at the same time the disadvantages of the “twelfth”. The interior itself, of course, looks brighter in the VAZ 2112. Plus, in terms of seating comfort, it is also preferable.

Technical data

Initially, the “two-piece” was equipped with a one and a half liter engine with a carburetor power system. This engine developed only 73 horsepower. But it was quickly replaced with a new injection engine with the same volume. Thanks to distributed injection, engineers were able to increase power to 79 horsepower without any modifications to the crankshaft. In the mid-2000s, 16-valve engines (or “shesnar” in common parlance) began to appear. These engines are very much loved by the owners for their manufacturability and relatively high technical data. Thus, the power of the 1.6-liter gearbox was 90 horsepower. The unit generated 131 Nm of torque. For comparison, the first one and a half liter engine produced only 109 Nm of thrust.

Which is better - VAZ-2112 or VAZ-2114? Dynamic characteristics will help resolve this issue. So, acceleration to hundreds for a “two-wheeler” takes from 12 to 14 seconds, depending on the engine. As reviews say, the “shesnar” is very playful and unpretentious in terms of fuel consumption.

So, a car spends from 7.3 to 8 liters per hundred in the combined cycle. The maximum speed is 185 kilometers per hour (on an 8-valve carburetor - 170). The gearbox is standard, five-speed, with mechanical gear shifting.

As for the second generation Samara, it was equipped with a 1.6-liter gasoline engine with 80 horsepower. This engine was paired with a five-speed gearbox. Which gearbox is better - on a VAZ-2112 or 2114? As you know, on the “nines” there were always problems with the scenes, which rang and flew out. On the 14th this problem was partially solved. But the “twelve” has a more reliable gearbox, which does not cause such problems for the owner.

By the way, since 2007 the car began to comply with Euro-4 standards. A catalyst and an electronic gas pedal were installed. By the way, the catalyst was not under the bottom, but near the engine. The receiver itself has become plastic (previously the inlet was aluminum).

Which is better - VAZ-2112 or VAZ-2114? Let's move on to the dynamic characteristics. Acceleration to hundreds in the second took 13 and a half seconds. Maximum speed is 160 kilometers per hour. In terms of fuel consumption, the car is not much different from the “two-wheeler” - 7.6 liters per hundred in mixed mode.

VAZ 2112 or 2114 which is better

In general, help me decide. The cost of the car is 90,000 rubles. In my region it turns out like this, VAZ 2112 2004-2005, VAZ 2114 2006-2007. Yes, I understand that you need to look at the condition, but I still wanted to find out which model is better in itself. Well, there are pitfalls.

Why will it be better? Plastic bumpers? A more cramped interior? The back door of both is crap on the girths and rots faster than the rest of the body. It’s more reasonable to choose from dozens and fives if show-offs are not needed, but these show-offs were relevant at least ten years ago. The internals are almost the same, there is no point in comparing. At one time, my choice fell on the spot and I didn’t regret it.
It’s more spacious, the suspension is softer and quieter, the cooling system is more advanced, the steering rack has a variable gear ratio (this is important without power assistance). I could go on for a long time, the tenth family is better.
I read the comments. Most people recommend 12. But dude, believe me, it’s the same thing. Whichever one you take. With these introductory conditions, just choose what you like best in appearance. There are no differences in operation.
I will give preference to the VAZ 2112, especially since you can buy a 16 valve, it will be faster.. True, look at 1.5 or 1.6 on some cars if the timing belt breaks, the valve bends.
In general, it’s true, look at the condition, 12 if it’s alive is better than it, if there is a live version of the four, and 12 are half-dead, then... Well, you get the idea. It’s just that at such years a lot depends on the condition.
I'll add a little constructive information. The tenth family has very weak side members and suspension cups at the front. They'll fucking rot. Engine - if shesnar - zbs, vosmishnik - ftopka. The bumper is an ass, the dimensions are not visible. You'll kick it on the first day. If you have the opportunity to take a spot, take a spot. And you can't make a mistake
Both are about nothing. One of the differences is that 99% of the Dvenar will have a 16-valve valve, which is faster than the 8-valve valve on a 4-wheeler, but if the engine has not been done, then if the belt breaks, the valves bend, repairs are not bad for the money. The seats in the 12 are more comfortable, as for me, you don’t get as tired as in the 4, although in the 10 you feel like you’re sitting sideways. the suspension is the same, the steering tips are different, there are hemorrhoids when replacing them, although in both cases these hemorrhoids are the same. They rot along the bottom and sills approximately equally, but the tenth family came across more rotten ones. The turning radius of the tenth family is larger - this will often infuriate you. in general, personally, for this money I would look at a right-hand drive Japanese Corolla with a 100 body, even in 110 you can find it, but for this money the condition will not be very good, yes, the year will be from the early 90s, but if you look hard enough, you can find a decent one option. I scrolled to the beginning of the post, looked at the tags, Ulyanovsk, hello fellow countryman)
Well, regarding spare parts, now there are no special problems with this, although of course it depends on where you order, if in online stores, such as existential, you will have to wait, I generally keep quiet about Emex, delivery times are wild, and there are stores that have good delivery times and It happens that there is something in stock. Or a 124 engine or that the pistons are guaranteed to be changed, usually if a person has a bent valve, no one thinks about whether to change the pistons or not =) although people are different, of course)
Look at the condition and don't be limited by body type. Dvenari and four are very fond of “smooth kicks”, and they squeeze all the juice out of the car. The cars are technically identical, it’s better to drive both and understand what your “worth” is. I drove both (my father’s 2110 and my 2115), the service level is the same. For me, 2114 is more agile compared to the “pregnant antelope”. With the same 8 grades. 14 engines are faster, and eat less. 14 handles more pleasantly, but is more rigid. The 10 is wider in the cabin, but the 14 is more comfortable for me behind the wheel, as I wrote above. Don’t even think about safety - both cars are ancient, the iron is tired, and who knows how many times it’s been broken, one or the other, both capsules of death, just don’t think about it. And if you want my opinion, take the classics from 10-12 years. It will still look like a car, unlike a 15-20 year old front-wheel drive one. I myself switched from 2115 to 2105, and still driving a foreign car I remember it with warmth and regret that I sold it. Many Ladas have only one owner, the suspension is fucking soft, and in terms of dynamics it is also slightly inferior to the front end. Yes, they are less “prestigious”, but stronger, because... have not exhausted their resource.

Suspension

Which is better - VAZ-2112 or VAZ-2114? Technically, these machines are very similar to each other. So, the front has an independent suspension on MacPherson struts. At the rear there is a semi-independent beam. Steering - rack. In luxury trim levels it can be supplemented with an amplifier. If we consider which is better - VAZ-2112 or VAZ-2114, both cars have the same smoothness. According to subjective feelings, the “dvenashka” is a little softer than the “Samara”. But this largely depends on the type of shock absorbers and the height of the tire profile.

Brakes

The VAZ-2112 and 2114 have mixed brakes. There are discs at the front and drums at the rear. Ready-made sets of ventilated discs with perforations are also sold for installation on the front and rear axles.

The cost of a new set with pads, caliper, pad and bracket is about three and a half thousand rubles per side.

Let's sum it up

So, which is better - VAZ-2112 or VAZ-2114? As you can see, these are very similar cars. The only significant difference is in the dynamics. “Dvenashka” (especially with a 16-valve engine) is more playful in traffic. The old 8-valve engine, which was developed back in Soviet times, migrated to Samara-2. Therefore, you need to start from the cost. The price for both cars ranges from 80 to 180 thousand rubles. When purchasing, it is preferable to choose a modern 1.6-liter engine. Reviews do not recommend taking a carburetor, since there will be many problems with it.